Bigger Homes Are Always Better Investments
Let’s talk about something we hear all the time — “bigger homes are better investments.” It sounds logical, right? More square footage, more value, more bragging rights. But honestly? That idea’s kind of outdated. And a little misleading.
Here’s the thing: bigger homes come with bigger everything. Bigger bills, bigger maintenance headaches, bigger heating costs (especially if you live somewhere foggy like SF). And unless you’re hosting weekly family reunions, chances are you’re not using half those rooms. Seen people buy homes with formal dining rooms they’ve literally never stepped into. It’s wild.
Now, when it comes to resale, size isn’t the golden ticket. Buyers today care more about how a space lives than how much space there is. A well-designed two-bedroom in a walkable neighborhood can outperform a five-bedroom in the middle of nowhere. It’s about lifestyle, not square footage.
Also, smaller homes tend to feel more connected. You’re not yelling across to find your partner or losing your dog in the guest suite. There’s something nice about cozy spaces that makes you actually use every corner. Plus, they push you to be intentional—which buyers love. It’s less “look how much space I have” and more “look how well this space works.”
So yeah, bigger isn’t always better. Sometimes, it’s just... bigger. And that’s not the same thing.
